﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Analysis and Product Quality</title>
    <description>Perspectives and issues relating to analytical methods and testing of dietary supplements</description>
    <link>http://www.npicommunity.com/Blogs/tabid/53/BlogId/8/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>editor@npicenter.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>contactus@npicenter.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:16:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.1.20.17153</generator>
    <item>
      <title>FDA "Approved" Lab vs FDA "Registered" Lab</title>
      <description>Beware of any contract lab claiming they are a FDA "Approved" or "Certified" Lab. Contrary to what advertisements claim, FDA does not approve or certify labs.  This is not to be confused with a lab claiming to be FDA "Registered" which actually does exist.  Any lab can register with the FDA without passing any initial inspection or having any particular certification. The registration is for drug testing only and in no way implies the lab is qualified or has the expertise to test dietary supplements. 

</description>
      <link>http://www.npicommunity.com/Blogs/tabid/53/EntryID/61/Default.aspx</link>
      <author>editor@npicenter.com</author>
      <comments>http://www.npicommunity.com/Blogs/tabid/53/EntryID/61/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.npicommunity.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&amp;EntryID=61</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.npicommunity.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=61</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>